Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooks-Pioneer Village, Kentucky Tornado

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 00:07, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Brooks-Pioneer Village, Kentucky Tornado

Non-notable. Neutralitytalk 02:45, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Keep A disaster that caused a $100 million of damage seems notable to me. It just needs clean up. CalJW 03:09, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Agree with CalJW. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:44, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
  • keep but tidy. Jcuk 11:07, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I've done some minor tidying, but could do with more. --Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 11:23, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak keep I admit to some geographic bias... but it kind of works against it here, since I live maybe 20 miles away and have scarcely heard of this. Then again, I don't really watch TV News at all. Anyway, it just happened less than a week ago and the article was created yesterday... let's at least give it some time to see if the article goes anywhere, and if anyone remembers this event in 6 months. --W.marsh 15:20, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Clean-up work appears to be in process and already met many of the objections here. -Jcbarr 18:30, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as original research unless it can cite sources not only for the factual claims, but also for evidence that this tornado constitutes a discrete topic of research. From what source does the article title come? Is that a NOAA name for the tornado, or the author's own arbitrary designation? Postdlf 16:38, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep despite the faults. Edgar181
  • Keep, but still needs some cleaning up. — TheKMantalk 00:01, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
  • keep. Kingturtle 08:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.