Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooklyn Arts Press (BAP)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Carioca (talk) 00:57, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Brooklyn Arts Press (BAP)

Brooklyn Arts Press (BAP) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable publisher. Less than twenty Ghits, most of which are from Myspace pages of people whose books they publish and web sites of said authors, as well as the official web site. Redfarmer (talk) 18:29, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete I can find no indication the subject of this article is notable. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:30, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete I initially thought about taking this to AfD for the same reasons, but thought give it a few hours first. You just confirmed my initial hunch. Mr Senseless (talk) 18:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete but next time lets try a Prod on an article that is 5 minutes old first. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 18:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

• Comment Possibly, but my rule of thumb for PROD is that the article needs to have had no significant edits in a couple of weeks or longer, and the creator needs to ahve been absent about as long. Otherwise it's a waste of time. --Dhartung | Talk 19:02, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete, notability not established. --Dhartung | Talk 19:02, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 12:32, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.