Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooklyn(blader)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 01:10, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Brooklyn(blader)

not notable. period. Opes 00:09, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - If I could figure out what exactly the article was, I'd list which part of WP:NOT it violated. In the meanwhile, Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 00:34, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment, I think this is a character on Beyblades. Not sure if that qualifies as encyclopedic. Ashibaka tock 00:35, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --M@thwiz2020 01:45, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• It very well could be, but it should be merged or deleted. Royboycrashfan 02:01, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. *drew 02:50, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom as non-notable and borderline nonsense. "Brooklyn is a mysterious blader who is even rumoured to come from another dimenson. He wants (it appears) nothing in life. He leds a life which involves no hard work and knows exactly how to treat animals, thus is often seen with birds, animals or insects around him. His appearence is therefore of a gentle boy, able to do no harm and having a calm life." --Lockley 03:24, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unsalvageable hoax and/or cruft of some sort. Even if the topic is notable this is likely beyond cleanup. (ESkog)^(Talk) 05:03, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, Beybladecruft. JIP | Talk 07:23, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, CSDs A1/A7. Ikkyu2 07:36, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment It's not patent nonsense - while it doesn't have any context, the individual sentences do make sense (kinda) on their own. Also, it's apparently a description of a fictional character, which means that it doesn't fall under A7 nn-bio. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 09:34, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment. Patent nonsense is G1; A1 is "no context". You're right that it's a fictional character and doesn't meet A7 (I guess; is that verified/verifiable?); I missed that on the first read through. -Ikkyu2 02:44, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as hoax and cruft. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 12:03, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or Improve Apparently a Beyblades Character, according to a Google search. Maybe one can specify that he or she is a Beyblades Character, and add an image as a reference.19:19, 3 February 2006 (UTC)nlarocca3
• Delete fancruft. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 23:35, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.