Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooke Wilberger

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 03:58, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Brooke Wilberger

A missing person. Not encyclopedic. Xezbeth 19:51, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)

• Weak Delete, She does get over 5000 google hits. But I'm inclined to say that abductees aren't encyclopedic unless they garner a huge amount of media coverage (ie. Amber Hagerman). I hope they find Brooke though. DaveTheRed 20:35, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. The Google hits seem to mostly come from web sites that list abductions, from message boards, etc. There are some news stories, but IMO, not enough to warrant keeping the article. RidG (talk) 21:18, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a milk carton. -R. fiend 23:23, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not encyclopedic. RickK 00:34, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, ad. Note, if this was re-written as an article I might vote to keep it. Wyss 00:40, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Weak Delete. I agree with DaveTheRed. --Ryan! | Talk 02:45, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Comment, agree with Wyss, needs a major rewrite. No vote as yet. Megan1967 05:37, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.