Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooke Skye (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:01, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Brooke Skye

Brooke Skye (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Procedural nomination from DRV here. Article was deleted in a previous AfD and recreated multiple times. Additional references have come to light in the deletion review, but there was no consensus regarding if these met WP:PORNBIO or other notability criteria (and they have not yet been added to the article). As this is a procedural nomination, I am neutral. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:52, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - I still do not see compliance with WP:PORNBIO. BlueValour (talk) 22:57, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - She seems to satisfy the basic criteria of WP:BIO: "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject." There's at least 3 non-trivial articles about her in what I presume to be reliable sources: Tampa Bay Times, UPI, and CourtTV Vinh1313 (talk) 23:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - Is the subject of multiple secondary reliable sources, the core criterion of both WP:NOTABILITY and WP:BIO. And according to WP:BIO's subclause WP:PORNBIO and porn actor qualifies if the have "been featured multiple times in mainstream media." (Even if a person doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO, they can still pass WP:BIO). --Oakshade (talk) 03:18, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
• Week keep. New information added since DRV establishes sustained WP:RS interest over time for general notability, but coverage is on the thin side. I would still like to see more. • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - I say keep. —Preceding unsigned comment added by VxlPoff (talk • contribs) 02:19, 13 March 2008 (UTC) — VxlPoff (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Keep per WP:BIO#Pornographic actors. According to her article, Skye's website was the first to offer HD video (unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre — okay, it's a little bit of a stretch). She's also appeared on Bubba the Love Sponge several times (featured multiple times in mainstream media) and was nominated as Xbiz Web Babe of the Year (been a serious nominee for a well-known award). — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 23:22, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep as above, notability is well established for this figure. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 19:09, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.