Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooke Haven

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per consensus PeaceNT 15:34, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Brooke Haven

Brooke Haven (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable porn performer, does not satisfy WP:N, WP:RS, WP:V Inkpaduta 05:12, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

• Keep Weak keep I can't find it in the WP:PORNBIO but I definitely remember something about anyone was has appeared in over 100 films being notable. One Night In Hackney 05:29, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Look under the "dubious criteria" section. Tabercil 06:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

• Comment Ah yes, I knew it was there somewhere....I'll change to weak keep in that case One Night In Hackney 07:56, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

• Keep, this section (which I'll presume is true) is certainly a claim to notability: Brooke has now worked in over 150 pornographic movies and with some of the biggest names in porn. Brooke is under a non-exclusive contract with the studio Vicious Media which allows her to work for other companies as well and where she also directs her own pornographic movies. Mathmo ^Talk 07:39, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

• Comment IAFD currently lists her as having 134 titles, it's not unreasonable to assume that may be out of date. She's definitely over the 100 threshold anyway. One Night In Hackney 07:56, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Keep A search for her name in imdb.com lists 120 films, which exceeds the threshold of 100 films mentioned in WP:PORNBIO. That criterion points out that films like this can be made in three days. Notability is thus minimally shown. More sources would certainly help. EdJohnston 18:25, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.