Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bronte O'Brien

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. -- Longhair\^talk 10:38, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bronte O'Brien

Bronte O'Brien (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

This appears to be a hoax or fantasy. No Ghits on "Bronte O'Brien" and "Dolly Magazine". Grahame (talk) 03:06, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete as likely hoax per nom's evidence. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:10, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 03:13, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete This probably qualifies for speedy delete. Dgf32 (talk) 04:37, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Dolly Magazine is a real and popular magazine aimed at young women in Australia, but the lack of Ghits for someone who won a major award at a very young age for writing in major daily papers such as The Australian and Sunday Telegraph strongly suggests that this is either a hoax or that Ms O'Brien doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability requirements. --Nick Dowling (talk) 10:14, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

  Comment: I wasn't implying that "Dolly Magazine" was a hoax, just that there were no ghits for the 2 in conjunction.--Grahame (talk) 12:25, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

• Comment Sorry, I miss-read your message - where you had 'and Dolly Magazine' I read as 'or Dolly Magazine'. My mistake. --Nick Dowling (talk) 09:51, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. There does appear to be an award of this name ([1]), but there is no list I can find on their site that has the past winners on it. Given the above, I'm inclined to agree that this is a hoax. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 04:53, 27 February 2008 (UTC).
• Delete Seems reasonable for this to be a hoax. Twenty Years 11:24, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.