Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brocas Helm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Daniel.Bryant 09:58, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Brocas Helm

Brocas Helm (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable metal band, fails WP:BAND. Prodded, but contested after four days by Orange ginger, who on the talk page stated Deleting this page is idiotic. I was curious about the band, and the page provided me with information. Why delete it? It just seems utterly pointless to me. Does seem quite uncontroversial, really. Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 12:59, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Weak delete. Reviews [here and here seem to indicate that they may have some notability that I can't prove, so someone may come up with better sources than I could. -FisherQueen (Talk) 13:49, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Strong keep This group is actually a very important cult metal band. The article could use a little cleanup but they are definitely notable (at least in heavy metal circles) and the page should be kept. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Prezuiwf (talk • contribs).

Keep, there seem to be enough referececs available to keep them, even though the original article was unfortunately created without any. For a start, I rewrote the intro and added some sources. --Tikiwont 10:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Strong keep I am the creator of this page, and I think the page should be kept. The band is very important in the Epic Metal scene, and has even headlined the first edition of the Keep It True festival in Germany (http://www.ancientspirit.de/liverevi/keep_03.htm). The "Brocas Helm" entry has been even accepted in the Italian wikipedia (http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brocas_Helm), so I think there's no reason for deleting it. -Nergal-Behemoth (Talk) 12:14, 19 February 2007 (UTC) •

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.