Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broadmoor village

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was nothing worth merging; redirect. Johnleemk | Talk 08:12, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Broadmoor village

Delete 40 house neighborhoods I don't believe meet wikipedia's criterion for notabilitiy Drdisque 06:09, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

If the content is merged, this article needs to redirect to it to retain attribution in the edit history per Wikipedia:Guide to deletion. - Mgm|(talk) 11:49, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge information relevant and notable to Sherwood Park, Alberta. JHMM13 (T | C) 07:08, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge per above. 23skidoo 17:06, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete This is pathetic! And I thought some of our school articles had nothing to say. Denni ☯ 02:00, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Broadmoor, California, which seems way more notable [1]; merge content elsewhere if considered useful. - Liberatore(T) 17:21, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - There's no sourced information (nothing worth merging), and this a trivial item. If somebody finds a source, then they should directly put the verifiable information into an appropriate high level article. Also, if we don't delete, but do a merge, I would do a disambig instead of a redirect. It's not clear to me that Broadmoor, California is actually "Broadmoor village". This makes me think Broadmoor, California is the "Township of Broadmoor", which is unit of government immediately below the county (separate from any city). However a place called "Broadmoor village" might be inside of Daly City, California, which is presumably close, but maybe not the same thing as the Township. Plus the Broadmoor, California doesn't say "Village" or "Township", but just "census designated" place, which could mean it's unicorporated. I don't know. So, I say just delete this article, and people can put proper info from proper sources in proper places when they have the time to do things properly. --Rob 19:15, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
  • merge as above.--Marvin147 03:34, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.