Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broadcast radiation

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was list on Wikipedia:Copyright problems. —Korath (Talk) 01:17, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Broadcast radiation

• I was going to tag this as a speedy, but thought it might have some potential to be re-written. As it is, it's bordering incomprehensible and is a likely copyvio. Slac speak up! 05:30, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• The topic sounds encyclopedic, and the material could be reworked into a good article. I don't think there's a deletion issue here at all. However, there might still be a copyright violation. Isomorphic 05:42, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep if rewritten. This topic has potential to be encyclopaedic. Megan1967 07:03, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Rewrite. I thought this was cancer victims suing the BBC. In its present form it is geeky gobbledygook. JFW | T@lk 14:12, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete this Copyvio from Cisco. It has been added to copyright problems. Editors are reminded that writing This information was obtained from Cisco at the bottom of the article doesn't give us the right to copy entire web pages. Someone can write a new article on the temp page; the topic might be encyclopedic. --TenOfAllTrades | Talk 15:07, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.