Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broadbandreports

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. — TheKMan^talk 03:09, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Broadbandreports

Not my nomination - User:Locust43 added an AFD tag but neglected to create this listing. Rhobite 21:15, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Clearly a notable web site - Alexa rank of 1202, over 1 million registered users, and it has been cited in numerous newspaper and magazine articles. See [1]. Locust43 appears to have some sort of grudge against the site. Rhobite 21:15, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep per above, dubious nomination. Sandstein 21:36, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep per Rhobite. Locust43 seems to be having a hard time understanding how Wikipedia works, based upon my experiences with him the past few days; this feels like a bad faith nom to me. Tijuana Brass^E@ 21:45, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, perhaps speedily given nature of nomination. (Note that the tag was previously placed and removed by Locust43.) Clearly one of the relatively few notable websites out there. -Splash - tk 23:13, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Although closely tied with one company, it's more than an ad or vanity. Well-written and formatted about a large, notable site. It's also been the source of lots of work for a year. Interlingua ^talk 00:41, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep per above. 199 19:45, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep per above. False nomination from someone with an apparent agenda. Obliter 09:40, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.