Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broad Street Run
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Fram (talk) 10:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Broad Street Run
Delete no third party references for this race, which apparently doesn't attract the a-list of long distance runners. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 23:46, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:22, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Weak delete per nom; however, WP:USEFUL applies. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 17:24, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep More then 57000 Google [1] hits. Seems notable --DimaG (talk) 20:51, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Scientizzle 15:27, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep: Over 600 unique Google hits, which is a lot, with a number of reliable sources in the mix. Now the trump card: over five hundred Google News hits. [2] RGTraynor 20:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. As there are no reliable sources cited, I am persuaded that the article does not comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 18:43, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Once again, a user misunderstands WP:VERIFY. A topic does not fail WP:V if article content is currently unverified, but only if the topic is completely unverifiable. Sources not yet placed in the article of a notable topic doesn't magically make the topic non-notable.--Oakshade (talk) 06:01, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - Major running event. The International Herald Tribune [3], USA Today [4] and the Philadelphia Inquirer [5] have given in-depth secondary coverage to this event (the latter multiple times), the core criteria of WP:NOTABILITY. --Oakshade (talk) 06:01, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
