Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brittany Hatch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to America's Next Top Model, Cycle 8. Consensus is that she does not justify a separate article, but it's a plausible search term and redirects are cheap.--Kubigula (talk) 04:09, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Brittany Hatch

Brittany Hatch (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Disputed prod - prod notice was removed with the comment "Ms. Hatch is not alone in being a fifth place contestan on a reality show and having an article. I see no reason to remove hers." My opinion: Ms. Hatch finished fifth on a reality show and that's about it. No reliable secondary sources provided. The slim assertion of notability - that she appeared in a magazine and a print ad - wouldn't be enough to establish notability even if they were sourced. Delete as not notable. Dawn bard (talk) 22:57, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete Just being on America's Next Top Model isn't enough if you've done virtually nothing else. Fails WP:BIO. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 23:00, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Agreed. Not enough to bring it above the bar of WP:BIO. --Pmedema (talk) 23:12, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Redirect to the appropriate season of America's Next Top Model as a plausible search term. Not-a-keep not-a-vote. -- saberwyn 23:14, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Luksuh 00:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Redirect per saberwyn ukexpat (talk) 01:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete: Fails WP:BIO. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 14:26, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Nobody ever remembers who won fifth place in Miss America either. Mandsford (talk) 15:09, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete LOL Mandsford. Per Mandsford. THE KC (talk) 02:06, 10 April 2008 (UTC).
  • Redirect per saberwyn. Redirects are cheap, and the series article has enough to scratch the surface.B.Wind (talk) 05:17, 11 April 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.