Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Britney Spears bootlegs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Britney Spears bootlegs

Britney Spears bootlegs (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

No evidence is presented that these fan-made/pirate-made mix CDs are in any way notable. --Icarus (Hi!) 00:59, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per above, for failing WP:N and probably WP:NOR. - Tutmosis 02:24, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per above, fails WP:MUSIC, WP:V and WP:OR. MER-C 03:32, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete for being britneycruft (if such a thing exists ;) ). These bootlegs are as far as I know not notable, and fails the requirements. Bjelleklang - talk 07:22, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Non-notable or else lets allow all bootlegs material on Elvis, Beatles etc Bec-Thorn-Berry 10:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete In ye olde vinyl days, "bootleg" actually meant something, and many were even released on labels of sorts (see Kornyfone for an example). In these days of file-sharing, MP3, and CD-R, anybody could make a "bootleg" in minutes if we really wanted to. This article also has some quality/verifiability problems: the first bootleg listed is scheduled for release in 2008! Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:29, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Notability. — Arjun 16:02, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete It is nonsense.
  • Delete. Non-notable. -- The Anome 16:41, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, I can't imagine pirate recordings can be notable. JIP | Talk 17:07, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per above  ::mikmt 18:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Does not seem interesting, or notable. Navou talk 22:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete arbitrary, unsourced, unverifiable.-- danntm T C 00:25, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. Realkyhick 06:55, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Non-notable and nonsensical. --MatthewUND(talk) 09:34, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, leaning towards a speedy delete. This appears to be the quintessential non-notable Wikipedia article for a myriad of reasons. The Mob Rules 10:15, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Non-notable. —ShadowHalo 22:26, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.