Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Columbia bears

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 06:00, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] British Columbia bears

British Columbia bears (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This crappy article has been here since June 2006, and contains raw text about British Columbia, about a few species of bear, and about how few forests are left in the world. All in all, it is redundant. This has slipped through the Wikipedia quality-control net (as with hundreds of articles I'm in the process of AFDing. Moglex 22:09, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom: only the first two sentences of the article are actually about both bears and British Columbia, and nothing's referenced. Propaniac 14:52, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
• Merge anything good, then Delete. Unreferenced with very little relevance to the title. Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 17:38, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, article doesn't match title. Realkyhick 18:21, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - looks like someone cut-and-pasted a class paper in. Stuff about bears is already in those articles, I suspect, and stuff about B.C. is probably already there. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:05, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.