Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Arctic Territory
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo (talk) 09:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] British Arctic Territory
I don't think this is a notable hoax, as hoaxes go. I can't find any coverage by any reliable, secondary sources. Furthermore, article doesn't read like an encyclopedia entry. Picaroon (t) 00:49, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete: Per the nom. I too, cannot find sufficiently sources to help here. Question for the nom though, I am confused as to why you restored this page from 6 months ago, just to list for AfD. - Rjd0060 (talk) 01:20, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - I do not think this was a notable hoax, though I have not investigated. If retained, to should be renamed British Arctic Territory (Hoax), so that its nature is immediately clear. Peterkingiron 23:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 12:53, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- The only person to have documented this hoax is the hoaxer xyrself. It's not documented anywhere else at all that I can find. There are no independent sources. The PNC is not satisfied. Delete. Uncle G 14:37, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable. Alberon 16:00, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- not notable. See also Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam/2006 Archive Dec#“powered by EJRS.com” --A. B. (talk) 17:54, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Once again, you go out of the way to mock me. I was new back then to Wikipedia. I had placed links to my sites on my own user page. So when I was told that one can't add links to their own websites on their own user pages, I removed them. That was ages ago. Am I still having to pay the price years later? As per Uncle G's note that the BAT is not recorded elsewhere, let me bring it to your attention that the article is at: http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/gb!bat.html EJRS
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
