Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Britain's Favourite Break-up Songs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-16 03:02Z

[edit] Britain's Favourite Break-up Songs

Britain's Favourite Break-up Songs (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Poor-quality, missing most of the songs, non-notable from a minor TV programme produced to fill out air time on a marginal TV channel. Nssdfdsfds 16:09, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete there is no indication of the survey taken to produce this list. Presumably it is detailing a one-off channel five program rather than to try an be an article about break-up songs. Pretty non-notable really. Mdcollins1984 23:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete It looks like it was only broadcast once, and there isn't any third-party coverage shown. So, non-notable. ShadowHalo 11:24, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Agreed, it's unnecessary. Corqueatsz 14:18, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 20:21, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-notable program based on a non-notable, unscientific survey on a non-notable topic. No evidence given that program or its subject were ever the subject of non-trivial third-party discussion. --Charlene 20:40, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as copyvio reproduction of a commercial companies original research without permission. Nuttah68 21:05, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Britain has loads of cheap, one-off "list" programmes - this is just another one, and on a channel which doesn't even cover the whole country. Also, the list is incomplete, and there is no information about what the programme was like. Looks like someone got bored halfway through writing it, or they turned on halfway through... Totnesmartin 23:22, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.