Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Briglin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 23:18, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Briglin
Previously tagged for speedy deletion for notability concerns. However, it does seem to have been written about and may claim notability. Procedural nom. Keilana|Parlez ici 22:31, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Lots of web hits. Seems to be a notable pottery. I've added some references. Pburka (talk) 23:49, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I Trokia Pottery, Poole Pottery are listed, why not Briglin Pottery, they are very similar except Briglin seems to have been lost in the record books and there is very little information anywhere to be found about the pottery which closed in 1990 appart from AA's book. Wikipedia is exactly the right place to list inforamtion about Briglin. please list it here. BR alex. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skippy8888 (talk • contribs) 02:03, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. The Independent and the Guardian think that this pottery is notable enough for them to write obituaries of the founders, so it is notable enough for Wikipedia. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:44, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Companies has been informed of this ongoing discussion. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 18:57, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - concur with User:Phil Bridger. Obits from two independent sources on founders is enough to meet notability bar -- Whpq (talk) 21:20, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
