Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bright Lands (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge with Flanaess. I have redirected the article; knowledgeable editors are encouraged to merge relevant, cited information. seresin ( ¡? ) 05:59, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bright Lands

Bright Lands (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Article about a fictional location within the fictional location of Flanaess within the fictional setting of the World of Greyhawk. This half-finished article fails WP:NOT#PLOT, nor does it provide any real-world content, context, analysis or reliable sources to demonstrate notability outside the Dungeons & Dragons franchise. --Gavin Collins (talk) 05:49, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions. —Gavin Collins (talk) 05:49, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
• Merge with Flanaess (or some suitable list of locations) or delete. No secondary sources, so not notable enough to justify its own article, but plenty of information that could find a home in article somewhere. Percy Snoodle (talk) 08:26, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep or Merge with Flanaess. BOZ (talk) 12:05, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
• Based on the current state of the article, being incomplete, I would have to support the merge or redirect to any related/appropriate article. I had close the previous AFD as being no consensus, although there were more stronger arguments for a merge or a redirect which is why I preferred that the WikiProject discuss on merging ideas.JForget 14:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep or Merge per others. No valid deletion reason given. All of the "reasons" given are cleanup issues and should be handled via the editing process. (Merging doesn't require an AFD.) Rray (talk) 15:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep. Gavin is just angry because the first AfD failed.--Robbstrd (talk) 01:56, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
• Comment - just a procedural question, but the two AfD's listed above are both for Empire of Iuz, which I assumed was a separate article. I gather the first was a combined AfD nomination including this one, but the second was Just the Empire of Iuz article, not this one. - Bilby (talk) 05:48, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

• Comment If anyone knows how to correct the second AfD listed , go ahead, as I don't know how.--Gavin Collins (talk) 12:29, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Its first nomination was from the series of article nominated at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Empire of luz in which this article was included which may explain why it is said 2nd nomination. Anyway I've added this link for the Afd's for this article. However, I don't know if it is possible to removed the second nomination of Empire of luz in the template here.--JForget 15:51, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

• Keep per First pillar, consistent with a specialized encyclopedia on Dungeons & Dragons for which there are many published books. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 14:27, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep or Merge per others.Shemeska (talk) 16:01, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
• Merge or delete Topic seems to lack both notability and real-world content to support its own article; on the other hand, it may be able to give better context in a parent article. – sgeureka ^t•c 08:15, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
• Comment I fixed the AfD list. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 03:25, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.