Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bright Commodity Broker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:41, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bright Commodity Broker

Doesn't appear to be a notable company, and the current article reads like an ad. Prod removed by author. Danny Lilithborne 22:43, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. There are plenty of search results for the name, but I didn't notice anything that would aid the article in passing WP:CORP. Erechtheus 23:11, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• I did not even finish editing this article. I don't understand why you say this is not a notable company? Bright commodity broker has been around for years helping clients in the futures market. It is registered with the NFA and CFTC, which are the regulatory bodies for futures trading. Why would you strike down a company for being added? Bud5000 00:29, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Because Wikipedia is not a business directory of every company in the world. It is an encyclopaedia. If you want to demonstrate that a company should have an article, please cite sources to demonstrate that the WP:CORP criteria are satisfied. Uncle G 09:33, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - does not assert notability according WP:CORP.--Ioannes Pragensis 21:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - I have had a good look through the Google hits but don't spot anything that make this company notable. Bridgeplayer 02:03, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.