Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Briefsism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete (Liberatore, 2006). 12:48, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Briefsism
ATTENTION!
If you came here because somebody asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus amongst Wikipedia editors on whether an article is suitable for this encyclopedia. We have policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting heads (or socks). You can participate and give your opinion. Please sign your posts on this page by adding |
I believe this article may be a hoax; there are other 'isms' out there we do not know of, but this one is a suspected hoax, I haven't found any reliable sources. Hence the nomination for AFD. HorroWiol 10:13, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above, as well as WP:V, WP:CITE as well as common sense. Killfest2—Daniel.Bryant 10:14, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, article is genuine, verifiable, was mentioned on 2-TEN FM a few months ago. --JasonWHall1 10:16, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- — Possible single purpose account: JasonWHall1 (talk • contribs) has made little or no other contributions outside this topic.
- Keep, verified, covered in many tabloids in the UK. --Bus Driver Matthew R 10:18, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- — Possible single purpose account: Bus Driver Matthew R (talk • contribs) has made little or no other contributions outside this topic.
- Still, it fails WP:CITE, WP:NOTE and WP:V. Also, it could be considered unencyclopaedic. Killfest2—Daniel.Bryant 10:19, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete (CSD G3) as obvious vandalism. Deli nk 10:33, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, Not nonsense, a topic of a paper by Roger Johanssen, not a joke, proper article. --SomersetWalkSand 11:10, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- — Possible single purpose account: SomersetWalkSand (talk • contribs) has made little or no other contributions outside this topic.
- Keep, genuine article, proof of it exists... I know! --LockAndKey12 11:13, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- — Possible single purpose account: LockAndKey12 (talk • contribs) has made little or no other contributions outside this topic.
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:46, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.