Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridge 55

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:46, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bridge 55

Bridge 55 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Does not meet WP:BAND. Tan | 39 02:04, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Just a note that the article does assert notability when discussing media attention. --Ave Caesar (talk) 02:56, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, this is why I started the AfD. Per WP:MUSIC: "Failing to satisfy the notability guidelines is not a criterion for speedy deletion. However, an article that fails to assert that the subject of the article is important or significant can be speedily deleted under criterion A7. A mere claim of significance, even if contested, may avoid speedy deletion under A7, requiring a full proposed deletion or Article for Deletion process to determine if the article should be included in Wikipedia."
  • Delete. Recieving some local media coverge for winning some local contest doens't satisfy the notabilty standards of WP:MUSIC. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:06, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
  • delete There is simply not enough cited. Maybe in a few years there will be. (Roodhouse1 (talk) 03:59, 19 May 2008 (UTC))
  • Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC.  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 04:36, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete As per previous comments. Ecoleetage (talk) 01:02, 22 May 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.