Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bride Adorned

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 17:04, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bride Adorned

Bride Adorned (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article/subject currently fails WP:MUSIC/WP:BAND. Their independent label isn't notable enough as it doesn't have a large roster of notable bands. Article has no sources to prove notability either. Scarian^{Call me Pat} 10:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

• Weak Keep - not an area of interest for me, but if they have a page at Librarius Metalicus then would seem to pass WP:BAND. A lot of sources are in Japanese, which is not untypical for cult metal bands. Last release in 2004 tends to suggest they may have broken up, but I'd like input from the sub-group on this one. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 01:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Comment - is Librarius Metalicus a reliable source? This is just a general question, I honestly don't know. Scarian^{Call me Pat} 15:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Comment. I would say that yes it is a reliable source - or at least as reliable as they get for that genre.Jellogirl (talk) 09:39, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mangojuice^talk 15:58, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Notability is not established here, and I'd prefer to delete the article (which has basically no content beyond the very basics) and let someone who does find sources build a good one if they exist, than assume that they do absent any proof for an apparently obscure band. Mangojuice^talk 15:58, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SorryGuy  Talk  07:15, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete discounting the self-produced debut, their only release was put out by a small production studio that doubles as a label. Without record sales data, significant touring, or a verifiable record contract, there's nothing to indicate that this band is notable. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 10:22, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as not notable, unless somebody comes up with some better refs. Jellogirl (talk) 18:58, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.