Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BrickFlick.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 01:40, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] BrickFlick.com

Not really notable. Alexa rating in the 2 millions. Crystallina 20:29, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - 'official website' is a sign of vanity. - Richardcavell 23:07, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete NN--Runcorn 11:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, TigerShark 22:07, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Tevildo 22:16, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. "combining the use of Legos and Video Games into Brickmation" sounds pretty cool -- and hence notable. TruthbringerToronto 22:43, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Our task here would be _very_ much easier if "being pretty cool" was the sole ground for inclusion on Wikipedia. Fortunately, it isn't. If this site is sufficiently cool to become notable according to the standards of WP:WEB, then it can stay. If it isn't, it shouldn't. Tevildo 22:51, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Wikipedia is an attempt at an encyclopedia, not a dumping ground for stuff which "sounds pretty cool". That isn't the definition of notability either Bwithh 01:18, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable. -- Kjkolb 01:44, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.