Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Rusch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Akhilleus (talk) 23:19, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Brian Rusch

Brian Rusch (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This biography appears to have been written by the person it is about, it contains no reliable references, the only link is an advertisement for his professional services. Much of the information contained in this article has been debated both on wikipedia and elsewhere on the internet and appears to be non-factual or embellished by the author for purposes of self-promotion. Chewabo 18:55, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Weak keep as I've added tags for POV, etc., as noted on the article and its talk page. It needs substantial editing, but I'm voting for a weak keep due to alleged notability. Bearian 20:11, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete I have edited this article before. This person is not a notable figure in the arena of fitness modeling or styling and all information included in the article is unverifiable. If it's OK to add links, I am doing so here: http://www.alldude.net/recordkeep.htm this person operates pornographic websites, and is listed as the custodian of records for these sites. The company that he references in the article (of which he is president) is the same company he lists on this adult website, and is only known for producing softcore pornography, not fitness-related products. Additionally, Rusch was never a fashion stylist, he was an assistant to another fashion stylist but never went out on his own. 76.170.6.228 22:23, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 00:27, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable figure, no referenced or reliable sources. Agree with bearin's comments but this wiki entry does not pass the 100 year test even with major editing. Jdspazz87 05:08, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unless some reliable sources show up. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:02, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included on the LGBT WikiProject talk page. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 20:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.