Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Kendall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 02:35, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Brian Kendall

Was tagged for CSD-A7 non-notability and for AfD, although AfD not completed. Article has limited claims to notability, so completing AfD rather than acting on CSD-A7. Note: technical nomination - no opinion from me. ➨ ≡ЯΞDVΞRS≡ 17:00, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete — Small college cartoon editor. No significant works that I can see, and certainly less notable than, say, an average professor. — RJH 17:33, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn as per RJH. --BillC 21:45, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per RJH Darquis 23:12, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. His creations seems to have a certain level of notability, but he doesn't fit in any WP:BIO exception. -- ReyBrujo 06:19, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a web directory, web hosting service, resumee promotion service. Such an entry requires significant occurance in "major news articles", preferably printed (not web only). If this entry gets through, a lot of people would get a right to establish similar pages. Wikipedia would thrive towards an "internet directory of people". The policy says: "It takes at least 5,000 sold copies" (as criteria to get recognized). alex 09:04, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• abstain Was Unicycle freeware? If so, "sold" seems irrelevant Did more than 5000 play it? Anyone who knows more about ancient Macintosh culture care to comment? JeffBurdges 11:45, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

--> This applies for persons to get considered "famous" enough for a personal wikipedia page, not for the "work" itself (in this case a flash movie). If it is interesting for "the public", and has been recognized in print media, then it deserves a page (but this does not automatically include an extra promotion page for the author) alex 12:14, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Wikipedia has too many trivial internet related articles. Sumahoy 23:44, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.