Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Fidler
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 03:16, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Brian Fidler
 |
ATTENTION!
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus among Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. Nonetheless, you are welcome to participate and express your opinions. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}} |
Prod removed by IP address, non-notable poker player. Many poker players have proteges however being simply a protege is not a sign of notability and if that is ignored accomplishments aren't enough to satisfy notability. –– Lid(Talk) 00:11, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
This AfD has been announced to Wikiproject Poker
- Delete does not meet notability by a mile. Hasn't won a major tournament nor made it to the Hall of Fame. Balloonman (talk) 16:59, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as this article refers to a non-notable poker player. According to the Hendon Mob database [1] he came second in a WSOP circuit game?! So what?! As per nom being a protege of Daniel Negreanu doesn't infer notability Nk.sheridan Talk 00:45, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NN, WP:BIO. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 00:56, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, placing 2nd in a circuit event doesn't make one notable. Merely being Negreanu's protege doesn't confer notability either. --Kinu t/c 01:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep There appear to be articles purely about him, including on ESPN. Thus meets WP:N as there are multiple independent secondary sources... http://news.google.com/archivesearch?sourceid=navclient-ff&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1B3GGGL_enUS251US252&um=1&tab=wn&q=%22Brian+Fidler 68.40.58.255 (talk) 02:29, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- I see all of two actual articles that mention him. The rest are either a) PR Newswire press releases or b) about other Brian Fidlers. --Kinu t/c 02:33, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- I found three. One is an ESPN article about him. Meets WP:N. 68.40.58.255 (talk) 02:49, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- I see all of two actual articles that mention him. The rest are either a) PR Newswire press releases or b) about other Brian Fidlers. --Kinu t/c 02:33, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - I still don't think that this poker player is notable, despite having an ESPN article. It must have "significant coverage" - this person does not. Additionally, the article provides no evidence that he has won any significant award. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 03:27, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. A few articles about his involvement in one (i.e. WP:BLP1E) poker tournament doesn't staisfy the "significant" requirement of WP:BIO. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:30, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete I'd have to say that this person is only notable for one event, and as such, fails human notability guidelines. Atyndall93 | talk 04:02, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
