Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brhmaand Pujan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Given the state of the article and the fact that the author's article has already been deleted, the arguments for deletion here are stronger.--Kubigula (talk) 04:26, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Brhmaand Pujan

Brhmaand Pujan (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I strongly suspect that this is a non-notable book, possible self-published - I can't find any information about the publisher on the web Anarchia (talk) 03:21, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Article claims that "leading newspapers" have given this book glowing reviews, but some research turns up nothing but Wikipedia itself. The author's article looks highly suspect as well. Zetawoof_(ζ) 03:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - obviously non-notable.Osli73 (talk) 09:35, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

• Re Nominate Naresh sonee page and KEEP it alive please. Dear Evric, Osli, Anarchia, Zetawoof, Double Blue, SatyaTN, Meanwhile, I have already added two newspaper translated reveiws on Naresh Sonee page as per your instruction.Consider it as Notability or Reliable Source. In day or two I will be adding more newspaper reviews. Your goodself were the Editors who were looking after my page. I have also requested Graeme, Kindly when ever your good selves feel free or have time, you'll feel free to edit Naresh Sonee & Brhmaand Pujan pages. I again request you'll to edit, improve & beautiyfy the same more.I can also email or post here scanned copies of newspaers of India. If there still exist some doubt in you in my integrity. or for my Guru Naresh Sonee. Please also see that the page sustain / exist for good global noble reasons and reactions. I am not here to spread hatred in world. Regarding the lines you object 'contraversial poet' - 'aroused reaction' on my page etc . Some editor must have changed my original script. Genuinely I have nothing to do with all that. If you check my first day page,of Dec 2007. My original lines says- Naresh Sonee Sohum Sutra is an Indian poet-author born on 11th February 1958 in Phagwara- Punjab . He is a commerce college drop out. At the age of four he and his three sisters along with his parents shifted their base to Mumbai . His father was a small time ‘wrist watch parts’ business man. Naresh Sonee enjoyed an in built quality of scribbling rhymes since the age of eleven. He writes in his country language Hindi as well as English . -' Some editors must had done changes of words, sentences for the sake of improvement. such change and added contraversial line 'aroused reaction etc... were not put by me.If you can check with your tools , check it out.I am innocent. Those are not my line. Any way I will re put to original line. But 'You all Dear' please also guide how can one keep constant tract on it done pages reading, verfying them time & again. You too will agree , It is not possible for me to guard my page every hour. if some new editor add such line innocently or ignorantly to improve the compostion. What can I do? Pls help me all of you. In due course I also fear that rigid religious or LGBT group/individual can also jump / interfere with my page to play mischief in editing in the name of improving or cleaning up. So guide me the right way as you all are all expert. Save rescue me please. -Alan Sun- --Dralansun (talk) 16:13, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Not notable enough yet. Fails Wikipedia:Notability (books). utcursch | talk 08:32, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

  I've read the "reviews" published in newspapers, added by the author (as stated below). Still, I don't believe this is notable enough -- the newspaper mentions are trivial, and don't indicate that the book is notable enough to deserve an article on Wikipedia. utcursch | talk 06:32, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

• I have added 4 news / reviews of Naresh sonee & [Brhmaand Pujan]]. They were translated from Hindi to English & put there. Please see if these four convince you for notability / or reliable source/ citition added criteria. I will be adding few news/reviews more from Indian news papers if these are not enough to convince you. However if my translation there on above submitted pages still un convince your goodeselves I can create and then give a website to you on which original scanned copy of news in Hindi language will effect & reflect.Your good selves can take help of a Hindi interpretor / translator to read them. With true regards- Alan Sun - --Dralansun (talk) 17:35, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

  Recently I have added 6 translation of news/reviews. On Naresh Sonee & Brhmaand Pujan ,All concerned notability / reliable sources could your goodselves witness there. News/reviews on above pages in question, please see &check if you are satisfied. Still If your goodself have any doubt or stay un convinced. Kindly spare time and read my discussion page. However if you still insisit I can add few more news/reviews and also can raise a temperory/permanent website carrying 'original scanned newspapers photos in Hindi' of news/reviews which will reflect there. I can give a permanent link in below references or below translated news, clicking on the URL any one can verify facts concerned to my wikipedia article or news/ review translated there.You will find the tranalation all accurate. I once again sincerly regards and empathy to all of your concerned doubts.Howsoever I want to satisfy/convince all of you , once for all. -truly- Alan Sun- --Dralansun (talk) 18:38, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - I think the recent additions establish notability. The article does need major cleanup work, but not deletion. Aleta (talk) 14:35, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Even with "newspaper reviews", we have no evidence that the papers themselves are notable. The "articles" in the papers, (if ever they even were in the papers - I admit I'm suspicious), read like editorials (think:"Letters from the readers") for the opinion section. The articles, as translated, are certainly not neutral and independent of the subject if the translations are in fact what this article says they are. Keeper | 76 18:00, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. I find it hard to read through the messy formatting to get to the article. Can someone with expert editing skills clean this up first, so that we can make a reasoned decision? Bearian (talk) 19:53, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. This book's author was already deleted by consensus. Keeper | 76 21:28, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. That's not an article - that's just a page telling me why there should be an article. Notable or not, there's nothing worth saving. Rocket000 (talk) 02:29, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.