Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brett buerck

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was: KEEP but MOVE to Brett Buerck. Consider it done! Tomer TALK 07:53, September 1, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Brett buerck

Non-notable Congressional staffer. If we had an article on every Congressional staffer, there would be about 5000 of them, if not more. Zoe 22:17, August 26, 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep important for his role in a scandal about redistricting, if nothing else. Trollderella 22:32, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
    • Now that Trollderella has let us know that his boss was a state representative, he's even less notable. Zoe 22:33, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
Zoe, had you read the article before listing it for deletion, you would have noticed that in its original form it did mention that he was aide to a state representative. I'm not sure why that makes him worthy of your contempt. His role in redistricting scandals, without doubt an important topic, makes this an important article to keep. Trollderella 22:36, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

Of course, we should move it to Brett Buerck. ;) Trollderella 22:38, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep. Notable as source of scandal. Sdedeo 22:56, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep Astonishingly, I actually concur with Trollderella. The redistricting scandal makes him more important than simply a staffer. Dottore So 23:37, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, the scandal makes him notoriously notable. feydey 01:04, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep and move to Brett Buerck. Sam Vimes 22:42, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep due to the scandal. *drew 02:05, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. If he hadn't been involved in the scandal, I would have voted delete, but this scandal (does it already have an article?) makes him notable enough for Wikipedia. Aecis 08:52, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.