Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brenden Wood

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was USERFY AND DELETE. Harro5 23:07, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Brenden Wood

This article was written by Brendenwood, which makes it look autobiographical or vanity. Understandably, that in and of itself does not automatically qualify for deletion. However, Mr. Wood just doesn't seem to meet the qualificaitons set forth in WP:BIO. His accomplishments really aren't more than any other radio personality. James084 20:25, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

• Improve Notability or Delete. He is a locally famous music industry executive. Does he have any claim to global importance? Government-official interviews, high-profile media coverage, etc.? I can't see anything here that anyone not from Australia could care about.  Cdcon  21:53, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

• Wikipedia has thousands of articles on things and people that non-Americans would not care about. "Nationally notable" should not be a reason to delete, particularly as "nationally" never seems to apply to the USA. End systemic bias now! fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 02:10, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. He is a Brisbane radio producer. His new career as an NRL referee makes him more notable but not enough to meet WP:BIO. Capitalistroadster 22:48, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 22:51, 25 February 2006 (UTC)"
• Userfy since User:Brendenwood is red. Just zis Guy you know? 23:24, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

• I like the Userfy option as well. I will join in voting Userfy. James084 23:35, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete (and if author wishes, Userfy). Does not meet WP:BIO. —ERcheck @ 00:11, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep as locally notable. — Adrian Lamo ·· 05:55, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy per Guy. Stifle 09:51, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy and delete Mangojuice 15:18, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep. Being a professional rugby league referee (in the top grade of the national competition of the strongest league country in the world) just pushes him over the line, as far as I'm concerned, although I appreciate that he may not be quite there in comparison to those we want articles on (famous MLB baseball umpires, international football (soccer) referees, radio presenters). fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 02:10, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy. Being an umpire doesn't warrant an article unless you are Dickie Bird. Harro5 22:50, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.