Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breaking DRM

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge/redirect --W.marsh 15:49, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Breaking DRM

  • Delete - Inappropriate tone and POV. nlitement [talk] 14:14, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Slight merge to Digital rights management. This topic deserves treatment, but this article is not it. —kotepho 2006-03-20 15:06Z
  • Smerge, per kotepho. PJM 15:35, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Slight merge and delete the remainder per Kotepho. --DMG413 17:13, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Digital rights management. Is there any content that can be merged across, allowing for tone?  (aeropagitica)  16:39, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • digital rights management is too long already? "This page is 46 kilobytes long. This may be longer than is preferable; see article size." - i want to try to merge all breaking of drm from multiple pages including copy protection digital rights management decss and many others... but if this isint the right way to do it, please let me know what is.Compn 19:23, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Move to 'circumventing drm' because i cant find any examples where drm has been 'broken' Compn 20:41, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Slight merge as per kotepho. --Snaxe920 22:28, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Slight merge and delete.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.6.65.219 (talk • contribs)
  • Comment Circumvention already redirects to Copy protection and is NPOV. Cmpn is on the right track. -- Perspective 22:15, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Circumvention of digitial rights management would not raise my ire, but this article is not a good place to start. kotepho 00:51, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Alternatives to digital restrictions may work, yes? -- Perspective 01:00, 25 March 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.