Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breakfast roll

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:46, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Breakfast roll

Breakfast roll (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article about a piece of bread. POV original research. Not notable, not verifiable (no sources in nearly a year). Valrith 21:06, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Strong Keep - Very recognizable and popular food, particuarly in the UK. Croissant is "just a piece of bread" also, but that doesn't make it non-"notable." Kraft Foods has their popular "Ole Breakfast Roll-up"[1]. On the net alone, there's multiple recipes for breakfast rolls [2] [3] [4][5][6]. The Pat Shortt song Jumbo Breakfast Roll, a song about breakfast rolls, was a number 1 hit for several weeks. And even The New York Times has had articles about breakfast rolls [7] [8]. And according to at least thress sources (including CNN), NASA astronauts eat breakfast rolls in space [9] [10] [11]. Just because editors haven't added sources to an article in a long time doesn't mean sources on the topic doesn't exist. This AfD reminds me of when an misguided user tried to speedy delete the animal fat article with the very similar wording "Unsourced and constitutes original research." [12]. --Oakshade 21:39, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Agree with Oakshade, and have to say, never even thought about the subject having an article before, but read it, and wow, the Brits love them the breakfast, eh? ThuranX 22:39, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep Agree with Oakshade. -- Theunicyclegirl (talk, review me!) 21:48, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.