Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breakfast at Tiffany's (play)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge and redirect to Breakfast at Tiffany's (musical) Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:28, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Breakfast at Tiffany's (play)
Procedural nomination on my part. Serving as the proxy of SFTVLGUY2 (talk ยท contribs), who attempted to nominate this article with a manually-inserted section on the AfD daily log page. I am correcting this error at SFTVLGUY2's request. Below please find the original text SFTVLGUY2 added regarding this nomination. Powers T 14:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- When created, this title should have been designated "musical" rather than "play" according to the usual Wikipedia practice. Had it been, I would have discovered it and not created Breakfast at Tiffany's. As it stands now, the article I created is more complete, with a photo, song list, external link, and links to far more other articles. Therefore, I believe Breakfast at Tiffany's should be deleted. Thank you. SFTVLGUY2 14:01, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect - if there is anything to merge, otherwise just redirect to the new article. Jayden54 15:09, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- Merge and Redirect. Per the talk page, this article started out as part of the main Breakfast at Tiffany's article (referring to the film), but was split into its own article. Assuming the text on the original page met Wikipedia criteria before it was split, it should be merged into the Breakfast at Tiffany's (musical) article. --Dachannien 16:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- If you "merge and redirect," what happens to Breakfast at Tiffany's as it now exists? Is it replaced completely? That shouldn't be the case, because it's the more complete of the two articles. Thanks. SFTVLGUY2 17:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- It means take any information in Breakfast at Tiffany's (play) that isn't already in Breakfast at Tiffany's (musical), add that information to the latter article, and redirect the first to the second. By the way, please don't pipe your links to articles when we're talking about two different articles with the same name. =) It makes it very confusing to tell which one you mean. Powers T 19:16, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. As usual, no deletion required. Merge and redirect. Trollderella 18:05, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect per above. An anon redirected with no merge, I reverted that so that the AFD will be closed properly. --Dhartung | Talk 19:28, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect per above. Eusebeus 01:01, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. We're being asked to split novels and films into separate articles. Why shouldn't we also have a separate article for this stage play. It was a major production in its day, notable for it's critical failure and the casting of Mary Tyler Moore in the lead role. Needs the usual cleanup and sourcing, but that's not criteria for deletion. 23skidoo 01:19, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
