Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breakaway (food)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yummy! :) - Mailer Diablo 16:28, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Breakaway (food)

A consensus was reached at DRV to overturn the speedy deletion of this article [1]. This is a procedural nomination so I abstain. Thryduulf 15:31, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Well known British brand name. Article is not advertisement. — Tivedshambo (talk) 16:01, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Then you should easily be able to make a proper argument, citing sources, demonstrating that this product satisfies the WP:CORP criteria for products. Uncle G 18:04, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
    • "Multiple non-trivial published works": See[2] & [3] - and that's without looking in detail. — Tivedshambo (talk) 23:32, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Abstain Do we anticipate a separate article on every cookie/biscuit from every manufacturer? If this one is unique or otherwise notable, keep it. If it isn't, delete it. I've never heard of this and the company, but is a single chocolate bar ever notable enough for inclusion without some other backup. Emeraude 16:43, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep. Meets the requirements for product notability. Original speedy was nonsense.Cynical 22:57, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Yum! Grindingteeth 15:03, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.