Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BraxtanFILM

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was NO CONSENSUS TO DELETE. The raw comment totals are 3-2 Delete. But one could take the post by User:Hanksta2 attempting to provide a reference as a Keep comment. But FWIW User:Hanksta2 has mostly only edited the article under consideration, and one of the Keep comments was a Weak Keep. So let's move on the arguments. The argument that the article is not verified is true. It should, however, be relatively easy to verify the article, unlike some unverified article. The claim in the article that Freddy vs. Ghostbusters is popular on the internet is not verified, but neither has it been refuted, granting its harder to prove a negative. In my mind this one juuuust falls off the bubble and survives. Herostratus 18:10, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Herostratus 18:10, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] BraxtanFILM

Non-notable independent film company. Lack of third party references. Google hits for ("BraxtanFILM -wikipedia") = 663. Fails: Wikipedia:Verifiability. --  Netsnipe  ►  13:41, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Weak Keep because of the popularity of Freddy vs. Ghostbusters - article needs to be seriously re-written, however, as it seriously comes off as a puff piece/ad at the moment, especially that "timeline". MikeWazowski 16:44, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Yeah, it needs to be re-written; and that's an on-going process. Would this article stand up better if there was a Wikipedia article for Freddy vs. Ghostbusters? Hanksta2 16:40, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: Yes, but if and only if it had "credible, third-party sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" per Wikipedia:Verifiability. But either way, this article also needs the same. --Satori Son 14:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - no independent sourcing or reviews to stand up notability. TerriersFan 03:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.