Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon blankenship

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete G11 by another user. Non admin close. See log for details. Have a nice day. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 02:02, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Brandon blankenship

Brandon blankenship (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Clearly a biography on the user in a place other than their user page. CycloneNimrod (talk) 06:24, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete vain vanity in vain. JuJube (talk) 06:42, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. Pure vanity page, written up as a bio (or maybe autobio?). No notability, no resources, just a description of somebody who's apparently got some rap mix tapes and is ostensibly really good at basketball. Sorry, but being good at b-ball isn't notable unto itself, you gotta be a pro and be really good. Look at Magic Johnson. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 07:09, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Looks like an autobiography of someone completely non-notable. A clear case for a deletion. vlado4

(talk) 07:22, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete Article creator is an SPA; I'll also point out that the article subject is supposed to be notable for his basketball/rap skills, while being fifteen. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 11:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Vanity page of non-notable subject. Minkythecat (talk) 12:37, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Blatant vanity autobiography of non-notable subject. Borders on an A7 speedy, though I guess the general vain tone of the article "asserts notability" despite the lack of evidence for it! ~ mazca talk 19:45, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.