Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandient

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 01:12, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Brandient

Brandient (discussion|history|protect|delete|undelete|logs|links)

Is this notable? It looks to me like promotional material. Any ideas? —— Eagle (ask me for help) 05:14, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

• Hmmm. No coverage by news sources (at least, GNews didn't find anything). No third-party published materials. On the other hand, it's written in a reasonably neutral manner, and it seems notable enough within Romania. Weak Keep, I guess. Delete per MER-C's findings. No prejudice against recreation if Ro-Wiki consider it notable enough for an article. riana_dzasta 05:30, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - no equivalent in the romanian wikipedia. MER-C 05:44, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Ah, no question then. riana_dzasta 05:48, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - also does not meet WP:CORP Criteria.SkierRMH 07:55, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete the company does not seem notable enough, most likely a promotional article.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 20:07, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. An advertisement. Also non-notable to boot. Spinach Dip 21:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete — Not notable enough - delete per all above. Reads as an advertisement. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 02:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.