Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Branded and Exiled

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Keep. -- AllyUnion (talk) 01:11, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Branded and Exiled

This entry is apparantly listing the tracks on an album, but it does not say by whom. Nothing here to explain why the topic is notable. Google on "Branded and Exiled" pulls back about 700 hits. Non-encyclopedic. Johntex 03:44, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)

  • By Running Wild, it's since been added. And their albums Gates to Purgatory, Under Jolly Roger, Port Royal , Death or Glory and Black Hand Inn all presently have track list stubs, and look at those redlinks. 532 Usenet hits for +"branded and exiled" +"running wild" – and 631 web hits, a very rare ratio; perhaps because few if any of these are selling it. But there certainly seems to be enough to say about it uniquely. Keep. Samaritan 05:53, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, now that context has been added. —Korath (Talk) 06:12, Jan 28, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep now in light of recent edits. GRider\talk 18:50, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete, Running Wild were never a major league rock band. Sorry but this just falls under for notability for me. Megan1967 00:22, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
    • Surprise, surprise. GRider\talk 00:28, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
      • It is true :). Running Wild were never a major league band. Megan1967 02:33, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.