Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Branch Admiral

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 03:35, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Branch Admiral

Fancruft. Entirely speculative Star-Trek rank Artw 03:33, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete, but the information is very good and could be merged into another article. Which article, you ask? I know nothing about StarTrek, unfortunetly Adambiswanger1 04:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete 'Many Star Trek fans speculate that...' '...has appeared [apparently only] in several unofficial publications...' '...the title was never deemed official...' Fancruft. Jammo (SM247) 05:34, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete 'According to some sources' Which sources? Information already covered in Starfleet conjectural ranks and insignia -- uruloki 09:00, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nominator and User:Uruloki. JIP | Talk 12:17, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, as if an article just for a fictional rank in Star Trek wasn't excessively trekcrufty enough... there's this: "The rank was never spoken of in a live action production but has appeared in several unofficial publications regarding the first season of Star Trek: The Next Generation."... sweet Jebus on a tricycle, save us from this. - Motor (talk) 14:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. --Xyrael T 16:52, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Per original nomination. — Mike • 20:13, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete (or Transwookie trekkie wiki to Memory Alpha, if they find it acceptable — which I doubt.). — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 23:43, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom; Trekcruft. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 00:42, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge to Starfleet ranks and insignia. It's already mentioned there, so all that's really needed is to stick a few more facts in. Bryan 00:25, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.