Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brainwashing 101
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 17:19, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Brainwashing 101
Non Notable 'Film' /TheDeciderDecides 06:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep. "A topic is notable if it has received significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." Here's three: The New York Sun,[1] The Chronicle of Higher Education,[2] and The Times Higher Education Supplement[3] (free copy). I strongly suspect this is a bad-faith nomination by a POV-pushing sock-puppet of an experienced Wikipedia, and urge a speedy keep. CWC 13:29, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- It could also be an experienced anonymous editor who had to create an account to make the AFD.--Ron Ritzman 00:09, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- I am an editor in good standing using a new second account as allowed by WP in order to avoid harassment. /TheDeciderDecides 06:08, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- It could also be an experienced anonymous editor who had to create an account to make the AFD.--Ron Ritzman 00:09, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Judging by the edits of the OP I agree there is something suspect going on. Definitely someone trying to make a WP:POINT or just sockpuppeting. Ben W Bell talk 15:22, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy keep and close. Creator of the AfD is an SPA, possible sock. Clear cut case of bad faith nom. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 19:47, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per above. Extremely difficult to assume good faith when a user's first edit is an AfD nom. Likely a WP:POINT violation. Resolute 05:04, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - remains me of Duke and Tome Wolfe's story about country girl one Charlotte Simmons, but still good written and in style. greg park avenue 19:18, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
