Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brahmin Tamil
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep --JForget 02:25, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Brahmin Tamil
Deserves discussion [Moved from PROD] - appearance at wikibooks is not sufficient reason for Prod deletion Mostlyharmless (talk) 03:45, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Obviously there's a wikibook with the same content. However, I think that the subject here meets WP:V, WP:N, and other criteria, and with a few alterations will form a decent article on the subject. Mostlyharmless (talk) 03:51, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Keep no reason for deletion. SeanMD80talk | contribs 03:54, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, Nominator has stated reasons for keeping, not deletion. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 04:15, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- cough Uncle G (talk) 04:19, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oops. So does that mean that we close this? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 04:28, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- cough Uncle G (talk) 04:19, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I can see no valid rationale for deletion. The article needs work, so keep for improvement.--Alf melmac 09:09, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, unless someone wants to make an actual argument for deletion beyond "copy of Wikibooks" (which is GFDL). If there is an issue with attribution I understand there is a technical fix. --Dhartung | Talk 22:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Keep There is no valid reason for the deletion of this page. This page talks about a particular dialect of spoken Tamil. Perhaps there could be more work and referencing of sources to back up the article. Wiki Raja (talk) 04:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep article obviously needs work, but does not need to be deleted — BQZip01 — talk 05:00, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.