Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boycott-MPAA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 03:42, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Boycott-MPAA

Delete The article title itself violates NPOV, and the article body is essentially an appeal to visit this and related websites Bugturd 00:05, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete site doesn't seem to have an Alexa rank yet. I disagree that covering a website with a POV is in itself POV, though. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:19, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete pretty much advertising for the website, doesn't belong here.--Alhutch 00:20, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as self-promotional advertising. —ERcheck @ 00:45, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as advertising, unencyclopedic. Dakota ~ ε 01:58, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Nick Catalano (Talk) 02:12, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, POV ad. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 06:38, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Royboycrashfan 07:09, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. "Faur use", indeed. StarryEyes 11:11, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete. boycott-riaa.com is notable - this isn't, but as a new site in the midst of the recent entertainment media controversies, I suspect it will in the future. Not yet though. Jamyskis Whisper, Contribs 12:14, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
  • In light of Paul Carpenter's edits, and the recent discovery that CodeWarrior seems to be involved with the boycott-riaa site, I change my vote to weak keep. Jamyskis Whisper, Contribs 07:19, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment, I've tried to bring this up to NPOV. I wont make a judgement on it's notability. Paul Carpenter 15:58, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• rename to MPAA boycott or merge into MPAA. The link to the boycott site appears as an external link on the MPAA page, but no context is given in the description. Carlossuarez46 20:21, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as irredeemably POV, advert, etc. Stifle 23:49, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.