Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boxing in popular culture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, no redirect necessary. Sr13 20:32, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Boxing in popular culture

Boxing in popular culture (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete - Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information and Wikipedia is not a collection of loosely-associated items. List seeks to capture any appearance of a boxer in any film, book or TV show. The assertions about the entry of boxing terms into the lexicon is completely unsupported by any sourcing and possibly constitutes original research. Otto4711 12:46, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

• Redirect to Boxing.--Edtropolis 15:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom - the boxing article adequately deals with this subject. Carlossuarez46 21:37, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect — to Boxing. The article alone isn't worthy to stay on Wikipedia, but I thik everything is covered in the "boxing" article. *Cremepuff222* 00:48, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete; no redirect necessary. —Psychonaut 15:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.