Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BoxTorrents.com (2nd)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 01:09, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] BoxTorrents.com

BoxTorrents.com (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Was {{prod}}'d, but since it survived an AFD, prod shouldn't be used. This is a procedural relisting. Prod tag was "This article does not meet several Wikipedia criteria (see discussion)." UtherSRG (talk) 18:51, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. There is no news associated with BoxTorrents, unlike The Pirate Bay. No other reliable sources either, and an Alexa test is not enough by itself, as the Alexa test is unreliable. ColourBurst 19:01, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Wikipedia is not a web directory. MartinDK 19:04, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Nothing there asserts notability. Just another torrent site. Caknuck 19:25, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, no indication of how this passes WP:WEB. Certainly can't find any press/independent coverage on Google. Some torrent sites (e.g. Suprnova, Pirate Bay, etc.) might be notable, but this isn't one of 'em. Seraphimblade 19:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, for my list of reasons please see BoxTorrents.com discussion, section Proposed Deletion. DocSnyder 00:51, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete After reviewing prior nom, there were only two reasons in four !votes to keep it. Three !votes were to keep if it could be improved, and the other keep !vote was in dispute over the Alexa Test, (which I don't know why any AfD editor would use the test given its flaws, but I digress.) In four to five months, there have not been significant edits to the article bringing it in line with WP:WEB or other Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Without a last minute overhaul, or some other reason offered, I think we can reach consensus this time --RoninBK_ETC 07:01, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.