Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bossy (Lindsay Lohan song)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep, as there certainly is no consensus to delete or merge. (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 21:35, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Bossy (Lindsay Lohan song)
Per WP:MUSIC#SONGS, this song is not notable and should redirect to an appropriate article. Mdsummermsw (talk) 12:31, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete There is nothing significant about this song that warrants an article. 209.247.22.166 (talk) 12:37, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment have we had a consensus yet on whether iTunes constitutes as a "real" chart??? Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 12:51, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment - WP:MUSIC is far from clear. WP:CHART, however, unequivocably says "Charts pertaining to only one specific retailer (such as iTunes, Amazon.com or Wal-Mart) should not be used." Thought the context is different, it would seem that charts that shouldn't be used in articles shouldn't cover notability. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:26, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Reply thanks for the WP:CHART link, I'm gonna save that away in my box of tricks. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 13:40, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment - WP:MUSIC is far from clear. WP:CHART, however, unequivocably says "Charts pertaining to only one specific retailer (such as iTunes, Amazon.com or Wal-Mart) should not be used." Thought the context is different, it would seem that charts that shouldn't be used in articles shouldn't cover notability. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:26, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, perhaps merge relevant material into Lindsay Lohan, independent article fails WP:MUSIC though. —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 13:22, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Per WP:MUSIC#SONGS, unless this article can verify through reliable sources that this song will be release as a single, there may never be enough verifiable and reliable information for the article to grow past stub status. SWik78 (talk • contribs) 14:30, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
*Keep - What is wrong with you people, the song has already been released on May 27, 2008...and is the first single off the album.....its 10000% notable....im very shocked your all saying "Delete"......instead of wasting ur time trying to delete on OFFICIAL single, you should go try and delete pages that are worthy of deletion and that are truly not notable ex: Mariah Carey's song Migrate -Migrate is not even a single and has a page, and not body is saying anyhting about it or nominating it for deletion, while Bossy is an official single form lohan's upcoming album....and it has already been released...and ur saying u want to delete it?? im very shocked.....KEEP KEEP KEEP......OOC OCD (talk) 14:59, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Comment Would an administrator please review OOC OCD's contributions? This editor, who clearly is obsessed with Lindsay Lohan and anything related to her, persists in vandalizing articles and using foul language on discussion pages. His immature rant above alone should warrant his being blocked. 209.247.22.166 (talk) 15:25, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment OOC OCD, in my opinion, is a sockpuppet of banned User:Brexx. There is currently a CheckUser request in place at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Girl Get it. The editing patterns of OOC OCD are very similar to the aggressive and uneducated edits of all of the previously confirmed socks of Brexx as well as Brexx's confrontational attitude to other editors. Once the RFCU confirms the identity of OOC OCD, his/her vote will be deleted per WP:BAN. SWik78 (talk • contribs) 15:40, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Girl Get it has confirmed that OOC OCD is a sockpuppet of a banned user. I have deleted the vote, OOC OCD will be blocked shorty. SWik78 (talk • contribs) 19:12, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment OOC OCD, in my opinion, is a sockpuppet of banned User:Brexx. There is currently a CheckUser request in place at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Girl Get it. The editing patterns of OOC OCD are very similar to the aggressive and uneducated edits of all of the previously confirmed socks of Brexx as well as Brexx's confrontational attitude to other editors. Once the RFCU confirms the identity of OOC OCD, his/her vote will be deleted per WP:BAN. SWik78 (talk • contribs) 15:40, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Though not released as a single, Migrate charted on the Billboard Hot 100. It passes WP:MUSIC. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 15:57, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Would an administrator please review OOC OCD's contributions? This editor, who clearly is obsessed with Lindsay Lohan and anything related to her, persists in vandalizing articles and using foul language on discussion pages. His immature rant above alone should warrant his being blocked. 209.247.22.166 (talk) 15:25, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Merge to album. Charted on the Billboard Hot 100, but seems to be insufficiently notable for a standalone article (i.e., no real significant sources). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 18:03, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Merge back into album until such time as it gets on to a proper chart, and then meets WP:MUSIC. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Esradekan (talk • contribs)
- Oops, thanks for that. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 01:55, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, this article has seven refs. I think that is enough to establish notability. Corn.u.co.pia ♥ Disc.us.sion 13:19, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment The number of references is irrelevant if they're not reputable. In this case, one of them is Lindsay Lohan's My Space page! 209.247.22.161 (talk) 14:01, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:47, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, notability is clearly established by the references, which include Billboard.com and People.com. Everyking (talk) 07:46, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. It provides information on a current single released by Lindsay Lohan. It is recognized by both Billboard and iTunes, therefore making this page a credible source of information. It was officially released and the page should be kept - ckmaharg (talk) 12:01, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Keep. It is a current single and it is recognized as so by Billboard, iTunes and more. Notable recording artist, notable song. Save-Me-Oprah(talk) 20:00, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, this article is based on reliable sources (Billboard.com, People.com) that manage to establish notability. Europe22 (talk) 01:15, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Keep. There is no reason why this article should be deleted. It's the lead single and whether or not it flops should not have bearing. The article currently seems large enough to me to warrant its own page.Zaque 24 (talk) 13:45, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Along with having some notable sources, the single is performing considerably well compared to Lohan's previous singles and is expected to make an impression on other charts in coming weeks. The single has only been released for less than a week therefore chart placements seem unlikely at this time. Also, the single was released exclusively to iTunes which is why it has not shown up on any preliminary charts anywhere else. Komsr (talk) 20:58, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment - notable song, which I would keep. I'm not going to "vote" or close this due to a conflict of interest. Bearian (talk) 18:16, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.