Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bormotukha

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep `'Mїkka 20:42, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bormotukha

Bormotukha (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Russian language slang term for cheap low quality wine. Totally unreferenced article. NO place in wikipedia for it. `'Miikka 07:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 22:54, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wine-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 22:55, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. This could be a very interesting topic, but at the moment it's unclear from the text. If this is really a common type of cheap wine, then it may be as notable as the finest vintage. Cheers, DWaterson 23:23, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
  • I was saying it is not a "type" of cheap wine". It is a Russian slang for "cheap wine". the term has no usage in English language. `'Miikka 23:31, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. The fact that it is Russian slang gives it a particular cultural interest which in itself actually justifies an article, rather than having one called Cheap Russian wine. Doudja 16:04, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Very weak Keep In all honesty it belongs as a brief mention in an article about Russian wine, which if I can create before this AfD close I'll just merge into there. However as it is own subject it does not merit an article for essentially a foreign language dic def. AgneCheese/Wine 20:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
    • <Shrug> Whatever. But if you write Russian wine and copy there some text from here, I will delete it as unreferenced. `'Mїkka 20:26, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.