Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borislavia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. enochlau (talk) 00:42, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Borislavia

Hoax? Zero Google hits, no source. User:Zoe|^(talk) 03:07, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

• It doesn't have zero Google hits, but it's awfully close. This article doesn't show any sources, and Google isn't helping us establish any notability, so for now, I'd say we delete it. JHMM13 (T | C) 03:09, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
  • The Borislavia in this article has zero Google hits. User:Zoe|^(talk) 03:21, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete No hits ComputerJoe 10:45, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Under which CSD ? —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-02 11:08Z
• Weak delete as non-notable or unverifiable. References look plausible, but can't find anything on the Internet. Might be archaic translation of name or just obscure. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-02 11:08Z
• Delete per nom. Werdna648^T/_C\^@ 12:15, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. NeoJustin 16:58, January 2, 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete we need a historian to verify. It should probably be merged with the duchy of Saxony if it is correct anyway. Dan 19:23, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unless verified. -- jaredwf 06:04, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.