Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bored and Evil
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk 02:35, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Bored and Evil
Non notable webcomic, found here. It's forums can be found here, with a massive 54 members, split between 5 different comics. No assertion of notability either in the article, or could be found on google. - Hahnchen 17:06, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
Keep [1] apparently somewhat notable. Image:Smilie.gifMolotov Image:Caranimationforvmolotov.gif (talk)- Hello? Please try a more restrictive google search, and have a look at the actual links. Most are webcomic crosslinking. There have been no major coverage by any respected (even in the webcomic world) journals/magazines/newspapers. Was your keep vote based purely on the google search? What makes this website stand out from all the other websites out there? - Hahnchen 18:16, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Instead of jumping to conclusions, and insinuate that my vote was based only on technicality (which you have no way of knowing) let us just wait for more votes to come in. I may be wrong - you may be wrong, time will tell us. Thanks : ). Image:Smilie.gifMolotov Image:Caranimationforvmolotov.gif (talk)
- Easy tiger. You need to put speech marks around it, or Google searches for every instance of each of the words "bored" "evil". It's not surprising that there are millions of such instances. It's not unreasonable to suppose that your reasoning is based on the Google search you conducted since you offer no other justification. If you were thinking other things but didn't write them down, people aren't going to be able to guess. -Splashtalk 21:00, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Instead of jumping to conclusions, and insinuate that my vote was based only on technicality (which you have no way of knowing) let us just wait for more votes to come in. I may be wrong - you may be wrong, time will tell us. Thanks : ). Image:Smilie.gifMolotov Image:Caranimationforvmolotov.gif (talk)
- Hello? Please try a more restrictive google search, and have a look at the actual links. Most are webcomic crosslinking. There have been no major coverage by any respected (even in the webcomic world) journals/magazines/newspapers. Was your keep vote based purely on the google search? What makes this website stand out from all the other websites out there? - Hahnchen 18:16, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- please stop playing Devil's advocate every time I vote "keep" on an article. I am not trying to get into debate, I am only trying to address my opinion - which I think should be plausible without comments under what I am saying to tell me that I am wrong. I respect your opinions, but somethings are a little too serious. I vote delete on most articles, and I think I have enough decision making capacity to vote yes or no. Again, thanks...but sometimes, no thanks. Plus that, I was concentrating more on Google hits that were obviously related to the topic...which I thought was others would obviously do because the rest are pretty irrelevant. Thanks. Also note that the first hits dealt with the topic at hand.Image:Smilie.gifMolotov (talk)
23:56, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- please stop playing Devil's advocate every time I vote "keep" on an article. I am not trying to get into debate, I am only trying to address my opinion - which I think should be plausible without comments under what I am saying to tell me that I am wrong. I respect your opinions, but somethings are a little too serious. I vote delete on most articles, and I think I have enough decision making capacity to vote yes or no. Again, thanks...but sometimes, no thanks. Plus that, I was concentrating more on Google hits that were obviously related to the topic...which I thought was others would obviously do because the rest are pretty irrelevant. Thanks. Also note that the first hits dealt with the topic at hand.Image:Smilie.gifMolotov (talk)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- I'd have replied sooner, but have cut down time from the wiki. I just thought that the external link you gave was your justification of keeping. Apologies if you took offence, happy editing. - Hahnchen 13:43, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
-
-
- Delete. The correct Google search gives 127 useful hits, and a substanital proportion of them do not apply. Alexa rank is off the bottom of the scale. Since there appears to be no reliable third-party sources in amongst the Googles, there is no reason to suppose this has any influence outside it's small sphere. -Splashtalk 21:00, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable webcomic fails google and Alexa tests. Dragonfiend 22:28, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Just isn't notable enough in any way that I can see. -- Captain Disdain 00:54, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - Changed my vote after some reserch, now seems not notable! Bwfc 12:36, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- how do u delete an artacle
- I would think the admin will delete this and any other articles Vfd'd. Bwfc 23:29, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
what?
- Delete after thorough review of the article, I change my vote. I still don't like being argued with constantly for every opinion I have on this site. Image:Smilie.gifMolotov (talk)
00:15, 17 October 2005 (UTC) - Delete unverifiable. Xoloz 12:21, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
