Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Booster 1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. Kurykh 04:02, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Booster 1

Booster 1 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Another mass nomination. Please see this AfD for the previous batch. The reasoning for deletion is the same; these are all unencyclopedic lists of trading cards with no sourcing, context, content or assertion of notability. BLACKKITE 15:56, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Also nominated:

Booster 2 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Booster 3 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Booster 4 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Booster 5 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Booster 6 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Booster 7 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Booster R1 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Booster R2 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Booster R3 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Volume 1 (Yu-Gi-Oh! set) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Volume 2 (Yu-Gi-Oh! set) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Volume 3 (Yu-Gi-Oh! set) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Volume 4 (Yu-Gi-Oh! set) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Volume 5 (Yu-Gi-Oh! set) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Volume 6 (Yu-Gi-Oh! set) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Volume 7 (Yu-Gi-Oh! set) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

• Delete all or Merge all into some kind of sourced List of Yu-Gi-Oh! booster packs with relevant information as to why they would possibly be notable. If an extended intro combined with informational sections for each booster with information (such as release dates, sale records, differences between American/Japanese versions, critical reception, SOMETHING) were added, that would make this more than a straight list and thus make it worthwhile. As a standalone list, it appears to be advertising. At any rate, all of these need to be deleted. The author can choose to heed my advice about a single article or not. --EnhancedDownloadBird ^(Upload) - 19:17, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - as per policy WP:NOT#DIRECTORY. LonelyBeacon (talk) 19:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete all The previous AfD batch mentioned WP:NOT#GUIDE, but I agree that with LonelyBeacon that the main issue is WP:NOT#DIRECTORY (and general WP:NOTABILITY). – sgeureka ^t•c 01:43, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete all. per nom's reasoning. Also, I notified the author of these articles though xe hasn't editing in over 6 months. Procedural. Keeper | 76 22:55, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.