Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boonsock
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Eluchil404 00:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Boonsock
17 Google hits disregarding misspellings of Boondock Saints, but the article says "oral tradition" so I wanted to bring it here. This article's been around since June with no content additions and the creator has made no edits other than to create this article. Zero results in GBooks and GScholar. Even if it's real, it's little more than a dicdef. kateshortforbob 15:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - unreferenced and apparant dicdef. No sources forthcoming, so delete. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 15:45, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NEO unless sources prove otherwise Corpx 22:13, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 21:16, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
